Case Results
Criminal and DUI Case Victories
Have you been arrested for a crime in Chicago, IL? Here at the Law Offices of Mitch Furman, I can protect your rights against the tough prosecution and fight to have your charges reduced or dismissed altogether. With over two decades of experience, I have ruthlessly defended my clients against even the most austere crimes and I work tirelessly to obtain the most favorable outcome. Whether this is your first encounter with the law, a probation violation, or a combination of criminal charges, I am prepared to defend you.
With my experience, knowledge and legal expertise, I will be able to build a strong defense on your behalf. My Chicago firm has a track record of success and a history of notable case victories that speak for themselves. I have been able to obtain numerous positive results for past clients. Check out my recent verdicts and case results and see for yourself!
Possession of Child Pornography Charge Reduced to Class A Misdemeanor
Case Victory: Felony Child Pornography Charge Reduced to Class A Misdemeanor
Date: May 2026
Court: Grundy County Circuit Court
Charge: Possession of Child Pornography (Felony)
Final Result: Reduced to a Class A Misdemeanor – No Prison Sentence
The Challenge
Our client was charged with Possession of Child Pornography following a lengthy investigation involving electronic devices and digital evidence. The allegations exposed the client to severe felony penalties, including the possibility of prison, sex offender registration consequences, and life-altering damage to his reputation and future employment opportunities. Illinois prosecutors aggressively pursue internet-related offenses, making these cases among the most difficult to defend.
The Defense Strategy
Attorney Mitch Furman conducted a comprehensive review of the State’s evidence, including the forensic examination of electronic devices, the circumstances surrounding the investigation, and the client’s background.
During negotiations with the prosecution, several significant mitigating factors were presented, including:
- Lack of prior criminal history
- Strong family and community support
- Employment history and ties to the community
- Issues concerning the strength and admissibility of certain evidence
- Rehabilitation efforts undertaken by the client
By aggressively challenging the prosecution’s case while simultaneously presenting substantial mitigation, the defense negotiated a resolution that avoided the devastating consequences of a felony conviction.
People v. X.L.
Will County Domestic Battery Case Dismissed
How can a domestic battery case be dismissed in Will County? Domestic battery charges in Will County can be dismissed if the defense successfully demonstrates inconsistent witness testimony, a lack of physical evidence, or constitutional violations during the arrest. At the Law Offices of Mitch Furman, we achieved a total dismissal in Joliet by proving the prosecution could not meet the burden of proof required for a conviction.
- Date: January, 2026
Case Type: Domestic Battery (720 ILCS 5/12-3.2)
Court: Will County Courthouse, Joliet, IL
Defense Strategy: Credibility challenge and evidentiary scrutiny
Final Result: Case Dismissed (Nolle Prosequi)
People v. G.K
Case Victory: 7th Offense Driving on Revoked License—Prison Avoided
Date: December 2025
Court: Cook County / 5th Municipal District (Bridgeview)
Charge: Driving on a Revoked License (625 ILCS 5/6-303) – 7th Offense
Original Risk: Mandatory Minimum 180 Days in County Jail or Prison
Final Result: 30 Days Electronic Home Monitoring (EHM) with Work Release
The Challenge: A “Mandatory” Prison Sentence
Our client was facing their 7th charge for driving on a license that had been revoked due to a prior DUI conviction. Under Illinois law (625 ILCS 5/6-303(d-3)), a fourth through ninth violation of this nature is a Class 4 Felony.
The statute is notoriously strict: it carries a mandatory minimum of 180 days of imprisonment. For most defendants, a 7th offense means an automatic trip to the Cook County Department of Corrections, which often leads to the loss of employment and severe family hardship.
People v. S.C.
Case Victory: DUI Charges Dismissed via Speedy Trial Demand in Cook County
Date: September 2025
Court: Richard J. Daley Center / 1st Municipal District
Case Type: Driving Under the Influence (DUI)
Result: All Charges Dismissed / Case Discharged
The Challenge: A Lingering DUI Charge in Chicago
Our client was facing a Driving Under the Influence (DUI) charge in Chicago. Like many cases in the Cook County court system, the prosecution was experiencing significant delays in bringing the case to trial. The client’s life was on hold, facing a potential driver’s license suspension, heavy fines, and a permanent criminal record.
The Strategy: The Aggressive Speedy Trial Demand
Under 725 ILCS 5/103-5 (The Illinois Speedy Trial Act), every defendant has a constitutional and statutory right to a timely trial. In this case, we recognized that the State was not prepared to move forward with their evidence.
Rather than allowing the case to be continued indefinitely, Mitch Furman filed a formal Written Demand for Speedy Trial. This strategic move placed a strict “clock” on the prosecution.
How the “Clock” Works in Illinois:
Out on Bond: Once a written demand is filed, the State has 160 days to bring the case to trial.
In Custody: The clock is shorter, typically 90 days, and often starts automatically.
Tolling: If the defense asks for a continuance, the clock “tolls” (pauses). We ensured the clock kept running by answering “Ready” at every court call.
The Result: Prosecution Fails to Meet the 160-Day Deadline
Because we maintained pressure on the Cook County State’s Attorney and refused to agree to unnecessary delays, the 160-day term expired. When the State finally attempted to set a trial date, we immediately filed a Motion for Dismiss.
The Judge agreed that the client’s statutory rights had been violated. All DUI charges were dismissed. The client walked out of the Daley Center with their record cleared and their driving privileges protected.
People v. P.R.
Facing DUI Charges in Chicago?
Don’t let a case drag on for years. You need a lawyer who understands the nuances of the Illinois Compiled Statutes and knows how to use the “Speedy Trial Clock” to your advantage.
Following the shooting death of a local drug dealer, police were too quick to arrest and pin this murder on a young male who had a history of purchasing marijuana from him. At trial, the State brought forth GPS and cell evidence, suggesting that Mr. Furman’s client was responsible for the murder since he arranged the meeting, communicated with the victim minutes before the murder, and was present at the scene when the shooting occurred.
Attorney Furman effectively cross-examined eight State witnesses, including a veteran detective and a police sergeant, meticulously poking holes in their theory of his client’s culpability.
After the State rested, it was clear they could not meet its burden of proof, and a not-guilty verdict was rendered after the trial.
People v. J.R.
Not Guilty of Theft Charges
The prosecutor alleged that Mr. Furman’s client was guilty of stealing over $2,000.00 from the complaining witness. Attorney Furman rigidly cross-examined the State’s witness at trial to concede that other people could have been involved in the theft.
After the trial, the Court had no alternative but to enter a not-guilty verdict.
People v. A.C.
Not Guilty of Battery Charge
The prosecutor sought to convict Mr. Furman’s client of battery on the complaining witness. Attorney Furman vigorously cross-examined the complainant to demonstrate that she was less than honest in her testimony.
After the trial, the Court entered a not-guilty verdict, exonerating his client of the criminal charge.
People v. J.K.
Following a bench trial, client was aqitted of all charges including domestic battery. Client was facing possible jail time and a revocation of his gun ownership rights. Our Firm was able to secure a favorale verdict.
People v L.M
Client Found Not Guilty of Possession of Firearm, Following a Bench Trial. State could not prove actual or constructive possesion of a loaded firearm that was recovered follwing a traffic stop. Firearm was recovered in a compartment behind dash which was accessible to multiple occupants.
Defendant and oher passengers invoked their Fifth Amendement Right to Remain Silent. State was unable to pin the gun on our client.
People v. D.D.
Contact Our Firm
Table of Contents
What to Do If Arrested for a DUI in Chicago?
Being arrested for a DUI (Driving Under the Influence) can be a traumatic and overwhelming experience. It’s important to remember that you have rights and there are steps you can take to handle the situation effectively. Here’s what you should do if you find yourself in this difficult situation:
What Should I Do After I’m Arrested
If you are arrested and accused of commiting a crime, contact Chicago Premier Attorney, Law Offices of Mitch Furman, today.
Walk & Turn Test
The Walk and Turn Test is one of the three SFT sanction by NTSHA. If administered properly, by a well trained officer it can provide an indication as to whether of not the motorist may be under the influence
Understanding Field Sobriety Test Clues in DUI Cases
Discover the crucial filed sobriety test clues in DUI cases. Our blog explains their significance and how they can impact your legal situation.
What Are Different Drug Charges In Illinois?
Illinois drug crimes include possession, manufacturing, delivering and trafficking of illegal substance. While almost all charges are felonies, in certain instances defendant can receive probation rather than jail time, and be able to expunge their record.
Schaumburg Criminal Defense Lawyer
Hire a Schaumburg criminal defense lawyer to protect your rights and navigate the legal system effectively.